Oliver Wrist aka Nickel Plated Bama found this chick a few weeks ago and went on and declared her the new day whooty.
I have to admit, that waist to tail ratio is completely bananas. She probably had to get the J’s done just so she didn’t look completely ridiculous. Those hips are crazy though. But does she really have the tail game?
Maaaaaaaaan. Those hips and thighs are Jessica Rabbit-esque. This is an awful lot of angle 1, how about that angle 2?
Naaaah shawty, that is angle 1.8 at best. I appreciate the work you’re putting in though. The back cheek is trying to peek over the horizon back there, but barely makes the cut. I said let a brother get that angle 2!
Now you don’t overshot it and went with the 2.8. Since when did an ass crack and an aggressive back arch constitute tail? I’m starting to get suspicious. This chick has something to hide. Fine, go ahead and give me angle 3.
Goodness, well, that certainly looks official. There isn’t much crease in the tail, but it looks real. I will say this, there is literally NOT A SINGLE angle 2 picture out there. NOT ONE. Something ain’t right. There are a gang of pics out there of ol girl as Laura Dore and her alter ego “Sweetie Cyanide”, but no one has ever gotten a clean profile. I’m not ready to declare Fail Tail, but she is definitely on the watch list. Don’t believe it is possible to look crazy thick and still not have ass? Peep this.
Sure, Brooke Hogan looks a little too strong, but she is thick. Thighs, hips, she looks like she might be working with something.
AHNT! Fail tail city. The only reason I know her ass has started is that waistband.
So Laura, you need to take the proactive approach and hit that internets with a clean Angle 2. What are you scared of? The people need to know.
Ollie, what you got?
-Brock
The pink photo says it all. Her ass is too long in that photo…the buttcheek should stop about 2 inches higher then the ass crease.
I think its a tail fail.
Shakira said it best…
“hips don’t lie…”
The phrase “fail tail” slips into my mind more times during the day than I care to admit. it’s tough out there on the streets for the ladies. All a brother has to do is step out on the concrete with his stunners on and walk around the big city thinking AHNT five times a block. not healthy.
This looks like a potential FT to me, but I’ll reserve judgment till we get an angle 2.
Fail Tail! so i’m a brotha who did a short stint in the burbs for highschool (gotta respect the education). this is the type of ish thats funny to me. i kno all too well of fems in hardtails (fail tail brooke photo) thinkin they have some type of plumpage. i go from the city where donks are in the surplus to AHNTs all around. if u want to see a whooty with tail on all angles (sheez kinda thick tho) i have 3 words, Elke “the Stallion”
~1~
For an arse-ologist, you seem to not understand why a whole lotta nilla hoes models suddenly have illusionary tails. It’s called saddlebags my friend. If a woman has hips, and even modest saddle bags, concentrated lower body workouts will produce the results in photos 1 and 2. But without the finishing touch of an actual rear, it’s all just smoke and mirrors (hence why so many fall victim to gels, fillers, and implants).
Conversely, you have a gang of chicks without saddlebags, who no matter how big the booty, will never have an arse so fat you can see it from the front. Those are the hidden treasures you lesser evolved beings men ofter overlook.
whooooooo…
look, in my defense i went through a GANG of photos and NEVER SAW photo #4 up there. But when I saw photo #5 i was convinced she had the gift. The reason??
The wrinkles in the backyard/legs. I mean, why would you airbrush and photoshop a chick and leave the hints of cellulite? Seriously.
So when I’m looking at ol’ girl and see all those creases and divots, I just insantly know that she is keeping it official.
This is suspect, I may be going back to the “lab” for a further inspection.
A reader of the BAMA set me up for an execution over on UVT. HAHAHA.
Brock, tell me you saw the Jessica Biel post the other day tho?
-Olls
Damnit man, the more I look at photo #4, the more pissed off I get at myself.
How did I miss that? I mean, just how the FUCK did I miss that.
I have rules. And no tattoos floating in random spaces on the female anatomy is one of them.
I don’t want some random thigh tattoo… WTF is that?
UGGGGhhhhh. Brock, please know that you ruined my day.
HAHA.
-OLLS
One more time again,
Brock, re-examine exhibit D (photo #4) is it possible, bare with me here, but is it possible that the crease was airbrushed out on the right thigh/leg?
Look at the other evidence that has been presented…
Homegirl has hips and thighs that tell the whole story that are inexplicably missing in the 4th photo.
I smell conspiracy damnit.
Lake, my white brethren, help a nilla out.
HAHAHA.
Stay up fellas.
Oh yeah, thanks again for calling me out, SMH “these muhfuckas”… LOL.
-Olls out (for real this time)
Damn, I can’t tell if you guys are too picky or if I am too easy to please, but there is not a god damned thing wrong with that girl up there (at least nothing you can see in a photo).
It really is hard out there for these ladies man. I mean I go to the gym, I run, I try to eat healthy. If women examined me the way you guys are breaking this (very [I]very[/I] bad) chick down….I just don’t like my chances. All the fail tail ladies out there not named Brooke Hogan, don’t sweat that shit.
I guess I am just a white guy’s white guy.
– Ian
Brother Ian. Don’t get me wrong. She’s got a nice body. She is a beautiful woman. I’m just letting these fellas know the tricks these ladies play. We’re talking about the difference between “damn she’s bad” and “good lawd, damn-ded my eyes…what angel have you sent down here on earth for a lowly man like me to endure as temptation from the gods!”. She can get it. Yes, she can get it.
Ok, first off, YES she can get it. There is no doubt. Now, I do believe that photo A have been shopped. Photo 2 she has the max back arch/lean so it is truely decieving, but matches up to photo A so the shopping slips by you. Now, photo C has the arch, but the cheek on has that lil pop up to it, nice. Photo D is by far the worse one and fucks the entire analysis up. I mean, no curve in the leg, just a horrible presentation in my opinion. But alast we come to Photo E. Now notice the depth between them cheeks. True, this could be shading, but as you can tell by the gap between her legs, this is simply a nice, solid, meaty tail sitting on high. Sure it’s not Serena, or CiCi even, but she was blessed and she is working it.
Oh on a side note, WTF Brooke?
Horrible, horrible.
Oh and Be please, the next time you feel the need to enlighten us on the “saddlebag”, don’t.
@ Mr. Jesus:
Since I’m not Amber Rose, I cannot enjoy a nice looking woman beyond the comment “she’s pretty/beautiful/whatever-adjective works.” So, since the name of the game is objectifying women, I’m just playing along in the only way available to me. And since a man likely came up with the term saddlebag, swallow your your medicine and shut your mouth.
Damn, all upset and shit. Sounds like you got passed up a few times late at the club. That’s aight boo, somebody is gonna take you home one night.
Hang in there
Does this count? The pillow/sheet may be smoke but it keeps the door open for more debate: http://www.sixshot.com/photo.asp?id=11788