<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laura Dore: Whooty or Fail Tail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/</link>
	<description>Brock &#38; Lake take on the world...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:03:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maskman</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11948</link>
		<dc:creator>Maskman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11948</guid>
		<description>Does this count?  The pillow/sheet may be smoke but it keeps the door open for more debate: http://www.sixshot.com/photo.asp?id=11788</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this count?  The pillow/sheet may be smoke but it keeps the door open for more debate: http://www.sixshot.com/photo.asp?id=11788</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Jesus</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11928</guid>
		<description>Damn, all upset and shit. Sounds like you got passed up a few times late at the club. That&#039;s aight boo, somebody is gonna take you home one night.

Hang in there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, all upset and shit. Sounds like you got passed up a few times late at the club. That&#8217;s aight boo, somebody is gonna take you home one night.</p>
<p>Hang in there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be On It</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11926</link>
		<dc:creator>Be On It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11926</guid>
		<description>@ Mr. Jesus:

Since I&#039;m not Amber Rose, I cannot enjoy a nice looking woman beyond the comment &quot;she&#039;s pretty/beautiful/whatever-adjective works.&quot;  So, since the name of the game is objectifying women, I&#039;m just playing along in the only way available to me. And since a man likely came up with the term saddlebag, swallow your your medicine and shut your mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mr. Jesus:</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;m not Amber Rose, I cannot enjoy a nice looking woman beyond the comment &#8220;she&#8217;s pretty/beautiful/whatever-adjective works.&#8221;  So, since the name of the game is objectifying women, I&#8217;m just playing along in the only way available to me. And since a man likely came up with the term saddlebag, swallow your your medicine and shut your mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Jesus</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11925</guid>
		<description>Ok, first off, YES she can get it. There is no doubt. Now, I do believe that photo A have been shopped. Photo 2 she has the max back arch/lean so it is truely decieving, but matches up to photo A so the shopping slips by you. Now, photo C has the arch, but the cheek on has that lil pop up to it, nice. Photo D is by far the worse one and fucks the entire analysis up. I mean, no curve in the leg, just a horrible presentation in my opinion. But alast we come to Photo E. Now notice the depth between them cheeks. True, this could be shading, but as you can tell by the gap between her legs, this is simply a nice, solid, meaty tail sitting on high. Sure it&#039;s not Serena, or CiCi even, but she was blessed and she is working it. 

Oh on a side note, WTF Brooke? 
Horrible, horrible.

Oh and Be please, the next time you feel the need to enlighten us on the &quot;saddlebag&quot;, don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, first off, YES she can get it. There is no doubt. Now, I do believe that photo A have been shopped. Photo 2 she has the max back arch/lean so it is truely decieving, but matches up to photo A so the shopping slips by you. Now, photo C has the arch, but the cheek on has that lil pop up to it, nice. Photo D is by far the worse one and fucks the entire analysis up. I mean, no curve in the leg, just a horrible presentation in my opinion. But alast we come to Photo E. Now notice the depth between them cheeks. True, this could be shading, but as you can tell by the gap between her legs, this is simply a nice, solid, meaty tail sitting on high. Sure it&#8217;s not Serena, or CiCi even, but she was blessed and she is working it. </p>
<p>Oh on a side note, WTF Brooke?<br />
Horrible, horrible.</p>
<p>Oh and Be please, the next time you feel the need to enlighten us on the &#8220;saddlebag&#8221;, don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock Hardon</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11924</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock Hardon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11924</guid>
		<description>Brother Ian.  Don&#039;t get me wrong.  She&#039;s got a nice body.  She is a beautiful woman.  I&#039;m just letting these fellas know the tricks these ladies play.  We&#039;re talking about the difference between &quot;damn she&#039;s bad&quot; and &quot;good lawd, damn-ded my eyes...what angel have you sent down here on earth for a lowly man like me to endure as temptation from the gods!&quot;.  She can get it.  Yes, she can get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brother Ian.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong.  She&#8217;s got a nice body.  She is a beautiful woman.  I&#8217;m just letting these fellas know the tricks these ladies play.  We&#8217;re talking about the difference between &#8220;damn she&#8217;s bad&#8221; and &#8220;good lawd, damn-ded my eyes&#8230;what angel have you sent down here on earth for a lowly man like me to endure as temptation from the gods!&#8221;.  She can get it.  Yes, she can get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian M. Summers</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11919</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian M. Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11919</guid>
		<description>Damn, I can&#039;t tell if you guys are too picky or if I am too easy to please, but there is not a god damned thing wrong with that girl up there (at least nothing you can see in a photo).

It really is hard out there for these ladies man. I mean I go to the gym, I run, I try to eat healthy. If women examined me the way you guys are breaking this (very [I]very[/I] bad) chick down....I just don&#039;t like my chances. All the fail tail ladies out there not named Brooke Hogan, don&#039;t sweat that shit.

I guess I am just a white guy&#039;s white guy. 

 - Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I can&#8217;t tell if you guys are too picky or if I am too easy to please, but there is not a god damned thing wrong with that girl up there (at least nothing you can see in a photo).</p>
<p>It really is hard out there for these ladies man. I mean I go to the gym, I run, I try to eat healthy. If women examined me the way you guys are breaking this (very [I]very[/I] bad) chick down&#8230;.I just don&#8217;t like my chances. All the fail tail ladies out there not named Brooke Hogan, don&#8217;t sweat that shit.</p>
<p>I guess I am just a white guy&#8217;s white guy. </p>
<p> &#8211; Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Wrist</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11917</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11917</guid>
		<description>One more time again,

Brock, re-examine exhibit D (photo #4) is it possible, bare with me here, but is it possible that the crease was airbrushed out on the right thigh/leg?

Look at the other evidence that has been presented...

Homegirl has hips and thighs that tell the whole story that are inexplicably missing in the 4th photo.

I smell conspiracy damnit.

Lake, my white brethren, help a nilla out.

HAHAHA.

Stay up fellas. 

Oh yeah, thanks again for calling me out, SMH &quot;these muhfuckas&quot;... LOL.

-Olls out (for real this time)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more time again,</p>
<p>Brock, re-examine exhibit D (photo #4) is it possible, bare with me here, but is it possible that the crease was airbrushed out on the right thigh/leg?</p>
<p>Look at the other evidence that has been presented&#8230;</p>
<p>Homegirl has hips and thighs that tell the whole story that are inexplicably missing in the 4th photo.</p>
<p>I smell conspiracy damnit.</p>
<p>Lake, my white brethren, help a nilla out.</p>
<p>HAHAHA.</p>
<p>Stay up fellas. </p>
<p>Oh yeah, thanks again for calling me out, SMH &#8220;these muhfuckas&#8221;&#8230; LOL.</p>
<p>-Olls out (for real this time)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Wrist</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11916</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11916</guid>
		<description>Damnit man, the more I look at photo #4, the more pissed off I get at myself.

How did I miss that? I mean, just how the FUCK did I miss that.

I have rules. And no tattoos floating in random spaces on the female anatomy is one of them.

I don&#039;t want some random thigh tattoo... WTF is that?

UGGGGhhhhh. Brock, please know that you ruined my day.

HAHA.

-OLLS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damnit man, the more I look at photo #4, the more pissed off I get at myself.</p>
<p>How did I miss that? I mean, just how the FUCK did I miss that.</p>
<p>I have rules. And no tattoos floating in random spaces on the female anatomy is one of them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want some random thigh tattoo&#8230; WTF is that?</p>
<p>UGGGGhhhhh. Brock, please know that you ruined my day.</p>
<p>HAHA.</p>
<p>-OLLS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Wrist</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11915</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11915</guid>
		<description>whooooooo...

look, in my defense i went through a GANG of photos and NEVER SAW photo #4 up there. But when I saw photo #5 i was convinced she had the gift. The reason??

The wrinkles in the backyard/legs. I mean, why would you airbrush and photoshop a chick and leave the hints of cellulite? Seriously.

So when I&#039;m looking at ol&#039; girl and see all those creases and divots, I just insantly know that she is keeping it official.

This is suspect, I may be going back to the &quot;lab&quot; for a further inspection.

A reader of the BAMA set me up for an execution over on UVT. HAHAHA.

Brock, tell me you saw the Jessica Biel post the other day tho?

-Olls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whooooooo&#8230;</p>
<p>look, in my defense i went through a GANG of photos and NEVER SAW photo #4 up there. But when I saw photo #5 i was convinced she had the gift. The reason??</p>
<p>The wrinkles in the backyard/legs. I mean, why would you airbrush and photoshop a chick and leave the hints of cellulite? Seriously.</p>
<p>So when I&#8217;m looking at ol&#8217; girl and see all those creases and divots, I just insantly know that she is keeping it official.</p>
<p>This is suspect, I may be going back to the &#8220;lab&#8221; for a further inspection.</p>
<p>A reader of the BAMA set me up for an execution over on UVT. HAHAHA.</p>
<p>Brock, tell me you saw the Jessica Biel post the other day tho?</p>
<p>-Olls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be On It</title>
		<link>http://uvtblog.com/2009/06/laura-dore-whooty-or-fail-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-11914</link>
		<dc:creator>Be On It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uvtblog.com/?p=13920#comment-11914</guid>
		<description>For an arse-ologist, you seem to not understand why a whole lotta nilla &lt;strike&gt;hoes&lt;/strike&gt; models suddenly have illusionary tails.  It&#039;s called saddlebags my friend.  If a woman has hips, and even modest saddle bags, concentrated lower body workouts will produce the results in photos 1 and 2.  But without the finishing touch of an actual rear, it&#039;s all just smoke and mirrors (hence why so many fall victim to gels, fillers, and implants).

Conversely, you have a gang of chicks without saddlebags, who no matter how big the booty, will never have an arse so fat you can see it from the front.  Those are the hidden treasures you &lt;strike&gt;lesser evolved beings&lt;/strike&gt; men ofter overlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an arse-ologist, you seem to not understand why a whole lotta nilla hoes models suddenly have illusionary tails.  It&#8217;s called saddlebags my friend.  If a woman has hips, and even modest saddle bags, concentrated lower body workouts will produce the results in photos 1 and 2.  But without the finishing touch of an actual rear, it&#8217;s all just smoke and mirrors (hence why so many fall victim to gels, fillers, and implants).</p>
<p>Conversely, you have a gang of chicks without saddlebags, who no matter how big the booty, will never have an arse so fat you can see it from the front.  Those are the hidden treasures you lesser evolved beings men ofter overlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
